Understanding USPAP -
by Phil Spool, ASA
Standards Rule 2 relates to the
report itself (Standards Rule 1 relates to the development of the report). SR
2 states “In reporting the results of a real property appraisal, an appraiser
must communicate each analysis, opinion, and conclusion in a manner that is
not misleading.” The key word here is misleading.
Must Not Be Misleading
Standards Rule 2-1:
Each written or oral real property appraisal must:
(a) “Clearly and accurately set forth the appraisal in a manner that will not
(b) “Contain sufficient information to enable the intended users of the
appraisal to understand the report properly”; and
(c) “Clearly and accurately disclose all assumptions, extraordinary
assumptions, hypothetical conditions, and limiting conditions used in the assignment.”
Regarding SR 2-1 (a), this is one of the most important requirements of
USPAP, that the report will not be considered misleading. Just about all
lawsuits and state appraisal licensing board charges include this as a
“violation.” For those appraisers who prepare their appraisal on a Fannie Mae
appraisal report form, it would be a good idea to take advantage of the
Addendum page to explain your primary reasons for the selection of comparable
sales and to mention why any adjustment you made might cause a red light in
the minds of the review appraiser or client when they are looking over your
report. I always tell my appraisal students to prepare their appraisal report
as if they will have to defend it in court or before their state Board or to
a client or review appraiser who needs to understand your selection of
comparables and your rationale for coming to your conclusion of value.
Standards Rule 2-2
Standards Rule 2-2 (a) is the basis for every Appraisal Report’s content.
There is a list of 11 requirements in the Appraisal Report and one additional
requirement if there is a need for an extraordinary assumption and/or
SR 2-2 (a) (i): “State the identity of the client, unless the client has
specifically requested otherwise, state the identity of any intended users by
name or type.” If the client’s name is confidential, then it has to be
disclosed in the work file. Only include other intended users permitted by
the client. It is also a good idea to state that “there are no other intended
SR 2-2 (a) (ii): “State the intended use of the appraisal.” Remember, the
intended use is not to determine the market value. That would be the type of
value as required by SR 2-2 (a) (v).
SR 2-2 (a) (iii): “Summarize information sufficiently to identify the real
estate involved in the appraisal, including the physical, legal, and economic
property characteristics relevant to the assignment.” You can provide the
address, legal description and a brief or detailed description of the subject
SR 2-2 (a) (iv): “State the real property interest appraised.” Typically, but
not always, this would be either the fee simple interest, leased fee interest
or leasehold interest. For residential appraisers it is almost always the fee
simple interest but for commercial appraisers, it could be the fee simple
interest or the leased fee interest or the leasehold interest.
SR 2-2 (a) (v): “State the type and
definition of value and cite the source of the definition.” Almost always you
are appraising the market value of the property. The Fannie Mae form gives
the market value definition but does not state the source of the definition.
SR 2-2 (a) (vi): “State the effective date of the appraisal and the date of
the report.” This is for the determination if you are valuing the property
for its current, retrospective (value in the past) or prospective (value in
the future) value. Only Fannie Mae can state at the bottom of the conclusion
of value that the date of the market value “is the date of inspection and the
effective date of this appraisal.” USPAP does not make this statement.
Typically, the date of your inspection (visit to the property) is your
effective date of value when preparing a current value. What happens if you
did not receive all pertinent information when you were at the subject
property and it takes a month or so for you to receive the information in
order for you to arrive at your value conclusion? Remember, the date of the
report is the date you send the report to your client. The effective date is
now one month or so earlier than the date of the report, yet you consider
your appraisal to be a current value. All you have to do is explain in your
report the reason for the lag time between the effective date and date of the
report. What should you do if a new sale closed prior to your effective date
but was not available when you did your research and shows up in the public
records just prior to the date of report? Good question!
SR 2-2 (a) (vii): “Summarize the scope of work used to develop the
appraisal.” Sufficient information includes disclosure of research and
analyses performed and might also include disclosure of research and analyses
not performed. While you determine the scope of work, your client should be
in agreement with it. (See Importance
of a Good Scope of Work)
SR 2-2 (a) (viii): “Summarize the information analyzed, the appraisal methods
and techniques employed, and the reasoning that supports the analyses,
opinions, and conclusion; exclusion of the sales comparison approach, cost
approach, or income approach must be explained.” You can prepare a paragraph
or two in your addendum indicating the approaches you used and why, and also
the approaches you did not use and why.
SR 2-2 (a) (ix): “State the use of the real estate existing as of the date of
value and the use of the real estate reflected in the appraisal.” This is
important when preparing a “prospective” value as the use of the real estate
as it exists as of the date of value might be just vacant land or the
improvements under construction. The use of the real estate reflected in the
appraisal would be the end product (such as a single family residence, etc.).
Therefore, a brief description of the subject property would be that the
existing use is vacant land or that the improvements are under construction.
This should be sufficient to satisfy this rule.
SR 2-2 (a) (x): “When an opinion of highest and best use was developed by the
appraiser, summarize the support and rationale for that opinion.” This is
important. When checking the box “highest and best use as improved,” in your
Fannie Mae form, you now have to explain your support and rationale for that
opinion. Just stating the definition of highest and best use is not
sufficient. Give an explanation for all four tests to determine the highest
and best use. If you are doing a “prospective” market value, then you should also
determine the highest and best use “as vacant.” (See Highest
and Best Use Analysis).
SR 2-2 (a) (xi): “Clearly and conspicuously: state all extraordinary assumptions
and hypothetical conditions; and state that their use might have affected the
assignment results.” Don’t get confused between an extraordinary assumption
and a hypothetical
condition. An extraordinary assumption is an assumption, if found
to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. A
hypothetical condition is contrary to what is known to exist. For example,
when preparing a “retrospective” value, you would make the extraordinary
assumption that the condition of the property as of the date of inspection
(visit) is the same as of the date of value (unless you are told otherwise)
or if you were not able to look at all of the rooms (or rental spaces) that
the condition of those areas are similar to those areas that were looked at.
If you are preparing a “prospective” value, you would make the hypothetical
condition that the improvements have been completed (subject to completion of
plans and specifications).
SR 2-2 (a) (xii): Include a signed certification in accordance with Standards
Rule 2-3. Keep in mind that this section was revised in 2014 to include “The
name(s) of those providing the significant real property appraisal assistance
must be stated in the certification.” While the certification does not
require the appraiser to detail what work assistance was provided, somewhere
in the report you should list the work, such as “measuring the improvements,”
“researched for comparable sales,” “verifying the sales,” etc. This would
give support to the assistant in their number of hours they participated in
when preparing their appraisal log for certification.
Standards Rule 2-2 (b) applies to Restricted Appraisal Reports. It was
previously referred to as a Restricted Use Appraisal Report. The basic
difference between the Appraisal Report and the Restricted Appraisal Report
is stated in USPAP, page U-vi # 5: “An Appraisal Report must summarize the
appraiser’s analysis and the rationale for the conclusions. A Restricted
Appraisal Report might not include sufficient information for the client (no
other intended users are allowed) to understand either the appraiser’s
analyses or rationale for the appraiser’s conclusions.”
Thank you, we'll be in touch!